IGN portal announced a month of medieval bohemia. Journalists are preparing a ton of materials about Kingdom Come: Deliverance II from Warhorse Studios. It all started with a show of pure gameplay from the first hour of the game, and then it is worth waiting for an interview with the developers and not only.

The video lasts 43 minutes. During this time, gamers are offered to get acquainted with a rocky indigor and other characters of the original. Mechanics training occurs right during an epic assault.

In the first hour of the game, you can undergo a training of owning a sword, play in the bones, stroke the pesel and study the local system of social interaction in dialogs. During the siege, it will also be possible to play for the father of the creative director of the studio Daniel Vavra (Daniel vávra), or rather, for the Boguta (Father Godwin / Farář Bohuta), whose appearance was presented by a relative of the developer.

Release Kingdom Come: Deliverance II It will be held on February 11, 2025 on PC (Steam, EGS), PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series. Text in front of Russian is present.

December 2, 2024 Sony launched a vote for the best titles for PlayStation this year

December 3, 2024 Crash Team Racing Nitro-Fueled will go to Game Pass on December 4

Kingdom Come: Deliverance II

The best comments

I went in adolescence to kickboxing, and I remember that there was always a LOC to sparring partner. In the game, everything is like in life))))

But seriously, the Lock in the game is really made in the best way. Yes, and could add muvs for a fight in the crowd, for example, a blow to the arc. If we talk about realism, then in reality I can wave a stick so that everyone around is a touch)

Anyway, realism in games is a conditional thing. In reality, Indirzhikha would not have beaten, but they would simply throw a crowd to the ground, raised it and stuck a branch in the eye. There are a lot of conventions in games in order to push the shortcomings for the realism.

I did not say that she should be like a Soulslaik. But there are no convenience in mass battles in Kingdom Kama. Or once the game is sharpened for realism, then it should be uncomfortable?

Please fix. "Lasts" in this case is not an infinitive, a mild sign of excess.)

Target Lock, or rather, its weakening. In the first part, a rather strict Lock for a specific goal is that during a fight with a crowd (and the majority of such battles in the game) is not particularly convenient.

This is not about the enemies to fit in turn. The point is that these battles are realized playing is debatable and inconvenient.

For example: each battle in the game is realized through the LOK for targets, and switching between targets occurs extremely crooked. If, against the background of the "sight" the enemy runs out, then the gg can calmly cub it, take a look at him, peer in place by 180 ° and get a mace in the ass.

The maneuvering boils down to 3 tactics: to run away, and then shoot from onions/apply 1-2 strokes and run back or press your back against the wall and parry all the incoming cuffs or farting back and hope that no one can go behind the back.

In this situation, a cool action movie is reduced only to the Q and S button. Do not need ligaments of blows, clinchs, dumps, you need only an ideal block, reverse and LKM.

P. WITH. In general, the advice “combine block and blows” is about any more or less difficult battle in the game.

P. WITH. WITH. And still retreating https://casino-red.co.uk/mobile-app/ back you can go to the bush, then it will not be possible to get along the enemies at all, since the indigions will not reach the enemies of enemies. But you can sit on a bush from a bow))

Put on the coolest armor in history, and 4 gopniks will simply surround you, dug into your knees, squeeze to the ground, and then the story about the stick in the eye. Try to lie under a bar with a weight of ~ 180 kg – just the weight of two people, and then jump up quickly. You will be surprised how fast.

The moral of this fable is this – even a lion is lying in a crowd.

It’s difficult to break through them, indeed, only I didn’t say about to break through. But stick a knife in a weak place – this is the solution. Do you think the peasants will jump on the sword? They will not surround? No equipment in the world will save you from the crowd. Especially if the crowd has a goal on a pitchfork.

About the video: see how the reconstructors are fighting. There are 3 in 1 always win.

Well, you write "most likely it will not work". Why? The knight has 360 ° review? He is a dove? And at what point Indo became a knight?

Or do you say that the knight will wave the sword to smash like insane? Then he will get tired in 10-15 minutes, and will become even more easy.

And in general, these are some wet fantasies that a person can defeat several opponents in the fight. In some AN*there maybe, but in reality there is no, alas. There are exceptions, of course, and history knows them, but these are exceptions.

You won’t believe it, tried and even fell. In this post, the comment was written about what was engaged in kickboxing. A person on two legs stands, this is an extremely unstable design. And you tried to stand on your feet while they are trying to tie you, and another 20 kg of weight is on you?

And while the knight will “break your hands” of the peasant behind him, the peasant will cling to his face in the face. And the peasant will cling to the hand on the side. You forget that they will not take turns attacking. While the knight concentrates on more dangerous enemies, less dangerous enemies will destroy him.

Shogun about the Englishman and this is a historical novel, that is, artistic interpretation of real events with the introduction of fictional characters, but ok, is not counted. Then give an example, or a video where the historian says that 1 in 3 knight will smash all

I’m sorry, what should be? Xs, but the fights were realized by the norms for a game trying to mow under realism and where enemies are inclined to attack at the same time, and not noble to wait for their turn, as in the Assassins. You will train a little, and you will take at least one on a onion with a shot, and combine the attacks with the weapons and protection with the shield, constantly maneuvering.

Activatively, the peasant will not turn into the head from the back to cling to the knight’s feet and tie him, or raise him and cling to the eye. + I haven’t said anything about mobility anywhere, and in your videos there is no moment where the knight is opposed to at least two or three enemies. And nifiga is not a tank of his years. You just can’t fight a winning battle when you were surrounded, this is a fact. You will not keep track of everything at once. What kind of armor and what kind of sword you have.

Here you write: "There is little chance". And there are explanations why any person will not do as I described the paragraph above?

Read the book "Shogun". It perfectly described how 4 people without weapons and armor in general on Izi can immobilize the warrior armed with katana. The warrior, however, is also without lance armor, but if he were in them, the situation would not have changed.

So if you think fluently, you can figure out something like a kick back on a close enemy. This, of course, is not realistic, t.To. stability drops sharply, but as an example.

I hope the developers will come up with how conveniently to realize battles with more than one enemy. In the first part, it was pain, especially if there are more than three opponents and fights in the forest or among the bushes.

To stick a knife in a weak place, you need to get into the knight closely, which is in a direct collision of gopniks, most likely it will not work, even though round dance around him. And the knight himself at the same time is almost as mobile as the gopniks themselves, only at the same time armored and with a more deadly gun.

Of course, a crowd of 50 people will take out a knight, but I do not see the point of considering such a situation, t.To. here what is in armor, what without armor, there is no difference. The only thing, probably, how many victims will be in the crowd before people fall in the armor or without it.

Well, yes, yes … and the knight will stand and wait for the clay peasants to deign to surround him and kick under their knees, because the knight does not withdraw one gopnik from the battle for one blow (most likely even deadly). If you remember about bows or crossbows, I will say right away that they can hardly break through the armor, and under the armor is still a pallet.

All infa: how people move in armor and how to break it off, quickly google

And here the review? A person without armor has 360 ° review? If you want to say that the peasant attacks from the back while the knight is busy others, then the peasant still has little chance of success, t.To. You have to be an experienced fighter to get into weaknesses of armor and have the necessary weapons.

A knight in the Middle Ages, it is like a tank in the 20th century, yes, you can destroy, but this is necessary for knowledge, experience and a certain weapon.

I use the word "knight" so as not to write "warrior in heavy armor" every time

Dude in complete armor is not an anime hero, this is a combat unit, which can barely immobilize the same dude in armor, what can we say about the peasants.

By the way, yes. The pitchfork then were wooden

In reality, Indirzhikha would not have beaten, but they would simply throw a crowd to the ground, raised it and stuck a branch in the eye.

If you mean that the armor is heavy and clumsy, then this is a myth. The crowd of peasants would have to seriously try to tie the knight in heavy armor, and still stay alive, after that, t.To. The knight would quickly jump to his feet.

Well, it will be clutching further? He will pull on himself? You someday tried to throw someone to the ground? And an adult man with +20 kg of armor? Clutch to immobilize? The second and the cluttered hands from the sword, the dude in armor will not take a big difficulty to hit the napsheck in the direction of the clung.

You just can’t fight a winning battle when you were surrounded, this is a fact. You will not keep track of everything at once. What kind of armor and what kind of sword you have.

So the armor allows you to concentrate on more dangerous enemies, the rest will not be able to do anything dude in armor. He does not have to follow everyone, he has a cheat code for armor.

This is the argument went! Apopetic novel from an American about Japan of the 17th century! Why read historians and listen to the Chuvaks, which are engaged in historical reconstruction, when there is an American fantasized about Japan?

So the whole point is the presence of this armor. I always write about dude in armor. For the most part, only lat and allow the person to survive against gopniks.

In reality, it would be convenient for you to fight on swords with a crowd? I think there is no))) and I don’t understand that it is uncomfortable … Without special problems, in a few hours of gameplay, you can adopt and in the end it becomes even easy.

This is not a Dark Salt or Elden Ring with a Witcher. The game is not from this plan where you can smoke in multi -ton armor and three -meter clubs on the shoulder -shaft like a Shaolinsky monk